|
3148 REVIEW DENIED Primary assumption of the risk did not bar an action for injuries resulting from the crash of a private airplane due to failure of defendant's airstrip clearance approach to meet requirements established by applicable regulations; allegations that the improper clearance approach caused plaintiff pilot to bank too steeply resulting in a stall of his engine were sufficient to raise a question of fact regarding causation; entry on land for the purpose of eating lunch at a restaurant there was not subject to statutory recreational use immunity.CitationGORDON v HAVASU PALMS (A/R Airstrip) 93 CA4 244 [See: CivC 846; Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Shannon v Rhodes 92 CA4 792, T/AT 11/01; Ornelas v Randolph 4 C4 1095; T/AT 5/93]
|
|
