Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
2928 A reinsurance association organized and doing business in London did not have sufficient contacts with the state of California to confer on California courts jurisdiction over a claim against it brought by individual underwriters at Lloyd&Mac226;s of London.CitationMALONE v EQUITAS (Lloyds Jurisdiction) 84 CA4 1430 [See: Vons v Seabest 14 C4 434, T/AT 1/97; Rocklin v Superior Court 157 CA3 91; Boaz v Boyle 40 CA4 700, T/AT 12/95; Burger King v Rudzewicz 471 US 462] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||