|
3107 REVIEW DENIED An insurer's reservation of the right to seek reimbursement for costs of defending noncovered claims, refusal to raise affirmative defenses requested by the insured or to prosecute a counterclaim on behalf of the insured do not entitle the insured to Cumis counsel.CitationJAMES 3 CORP v TRUCK INS (Cumis Counsel) 91 CA4 1003 [See: SD Fed CU v Cumis 162 CA3 358; CivC 2860; Barney v Aetna 185 CA3 966; Buss v Superior Court 16 C4 35, T/AT 8/97; State v Pacific Indem 63 CA4 1535, T/AT 7/98; Waller v Truck 11 C4 1, T/AT 10/95]
|
|
