|
P0050 Ambiguous language in a written contract justified the use of parol evidence to explain its meaning; refusal to make admissions regarding the requirements of a contract based on a reasonable belief that the contract did not set forth those requirements justified the trial court's refusal to award expert witness fees incurred to prove what the party refused to admit.CitationDARLING v CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS (Flatness Standard) 89 CA4 1221 [See: CCP 1645, 1856; Bartel v Associated 114 CA2 750; MacIntyre v Angel 109 CA2 425]
|
|
