Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
p0076 REVIEW DENIED An attorney acting as an arbitrator was not required to disclose that his firm had represented one of the parties in two previous matters, both of which were completed before the former client selected him as an arbitrator.CitationMICHAEL v AETNA (Arbitrator's Non-disclosure) 88 CA4 925 [See: CCP 1280 etseq; InsC 2071; Commonwealth v Continental 393 US 145; Coldwell Banker 62 CA4 716; Neaman v Kaiser 9 CA4 1170, T/AT 11/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||