|
3132 Possession of an easement over a road in a private community did not result in a duty to prevent the escape of vicious dogs kept by a person who occupied realty adjacent to the easement and not under the control of the easement holders.CitationCODY F v FALLETTI (Easement Holders) 92 CA4 1222 [See: Darr v Lone Star 94 CA3 895; Munoz v Davis 141 CA3 420; Martinez v B of A 82 CA4 883, T/AT 9/00; Davert v Larson 163 CA3 407; Ruoff v Harbor Creek 10 CA4 1624, T/AT 1/93; Portillo v Aiassa 27 CA4 1128, T/AT 9/94; Baley v Hink 133 CA2 102]
|
|
