Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3032 An action against an HMO for failing to provide adequate care to a member is not pre-empted by federal law merely because payment for the services involved would have been subsidized by Medicare.CitationMcCALL v PACIFICARE (Medicare Pre-emption) 25 C4 412 [See: 42 USC 405 etseq, 1395 etseq; Redmond v Secure Horizons 60 CA4 96; Heckler v Ringer 466 US 602; Ardary v Aetna 98 F3 496; Medtronic v Lohr 518 US 470; Cipollone v Liggett 505 US 504] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||