|
p0059 REVIEW DENIED Wholesale exclusion of entire categories of evidence by the granting of in limine motions should be upheld on appeal only if accepting all asserted facts as true and indulging every legitimate inference in favor of plaintiff leads to the inexorable conclusion that plaintiff cannot establish an essential element of its cause of action.CitationKRANTZ v BT VISUAL (Economic Advantage) 89 CA4 164 [See: Scheiding v Dinwiddie 69 CA4 64, T/AT 2/99; Union Bank v Superior Court 31 CA4 573, T/AT 2/95; Hunter v Pacific 37 CA4 1282, T/AT 10/95; Stein-Brief v Home 65 CA4 364, T/AT 8/98; Kelly v New West 49 CA4 659, T/AT 11/96]
|
|
