Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3073 REVIEW DENIED In a claim that defects in latex gloves caused users to sustain more serious allergic reactions than they otherwise would have sustained, the ordinary consumer has no reasonable expectations, so the presence of a defect should be determined by the risk-benefit analysis test rather than the consumer expectation test.CitationMORSON v SUPERIOR COURT (Latex Gloves) 90 CA4 775 [See: Soule v GM 8 C4 548, T/AT 11/94; Pruitt v GM 72 CA4 1480 T/AT 7/99] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||