|
p0056 Possession of confidential information is not presumed from the fact that counsel once represented a party and should not result in the disqualification of counsel, unless the former representation is substantially related to the matter currently before the court.CitationFOX v PALADINO (SLAPP Privilege) 89 CA4 294 [See: Ahmanson v Salomon 229 CA3 1445; Federal v LaConchita 68 CA4 856, T/AT 1/99; Bell v 20th Century 212 CA3 194; Maruman v Consortium 166 CA3 443; Hull v Celanese 513 F2 568; Gen Dyn v Superior Court 7 C4 1164, T/AT 8/94]
|
|
