3137 REVIEW DENIED A qui tam plaintiff's protest of defendant's allegedly false claim was evidence of his discovery and may have started the statute of limitations running against him in an action under the False Claims Act; the non recourse nature of a purported loan should have put public officials on notice that it was a gift rather than a loan and started the statute of limitations running in an action under the False Claims Act.CitationDEBRO v LA RAIDERS (False Loan) 92 CA4 940 [See: GovC 12650 - 12655; Rothschild v Tyco 83 CA4 488, T/AT 10/00 ]
|
|