3027 A plaintiff suing a landholder for injuries inflicted by third party assailants on the premises and claiming that the landholder failed to furnish adequate security must show that the attack probably would not have occurred if the omitted security precautions had been taken.CitationSAELZLER v ADVANCED GROUP (FedEx Attack) 25 C4 763 [See: Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666, T/AT 2/94; Sharon P v Arman 21 C4 1181, T/AT 1/00; Nola M v USC 16 CA4 421, T/AT 8/93; Leslie G v Perry 43 CA4 472, T/AT 4/96; Saelzler v Advanced (RevGrtd) 77 CA4 1001, T/AT 3/00]
|
|