3139 REVIEW DENIED Stares can be the basis of an action for hostile work environment sexual harassment; under the continuing violation doctrine, an action based on suggestive comments made outside the period of limitations is not time-barred if the comments were followed by stares that occurred within the period of limitations.CitationBIRSCHTEIN v NEW UNITED (Harassing Stares) 92 CA4 994 [See: GovC 12960; Meritor v Vinson 477 US 57; Accardi v Superior Court 17 CA4 341, T/AT 9/93; Hirase-Doi v US West 61 F3 777; Henderson v Whirlpool 17 FSupp2 1238; Richards v CH2M 26 C4 798, T/AT 9/01]
|
|