|
3013 DEPUBLISHED An action for unfair business practices based on the claim that defendant sold products below cost requires specific allegations regarding defendant's sales price and costs and of facts showing that defendant acted with the intent of injuring competitors or destroying competition; an action for unlawful 'tying' of products requires separate products in separate markets; an action for intentional interference with prospective economic advantage requires independently wrongful conduct; an action for negligent interference with prospective economic advantage requires the breach of a duty, and competitors do not owe a duty to help each other compete; an action for unfair competition fails unless notice required by statute is given to the attorney general.CitationVISIONSHAPE v KOFAX (Videoboard) 88 CA4 549 [See: B&P 17043 etseq, 17030, 17200 etseq; Cel-Tech v LA Cellular 20 C4 163, T/AT 5/99; Morrison v Viacom 66 CA4 534, T/AT 4/97; Foremost v Eastman 703 F2 534; LiMandri v Judkins 52 CA4 326, T/AT 3/97; Della Penna v Toyota 11 C4 376, T/AT 12/95]
|
|
