Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3158 REVIEW DENIED The federal Parity Act and the federal Truth in Lending Act did not pre-empt state claims by elderly homeowners who alleged that they were duped into entering reverse mortgage transactions by deceptive advertising and misleading transactional documents.CitationBLACK v FINANCIAL FREEDOM (Reverse Mortgage) 92 CA4 917 [See: 12 USC 3801-3806; 15 USC 1601-1667f; W&IC 15600 etseq; B&PC 17200 etseq; Crosby v National 530 US 363; CA Div of Lab Stds v Dillingham 519 US 316] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||