2997 DEPUBLISHED The fact that plaintiff was required to sign an employment agreement containing an arbitration clause before being hired did not make the agreement an adhesion contract, and the fact that the employer reserved the right to sue for injunctive relief did not make it so one-sided as to be unconscionable, so the agreement was enforceable.CitationPICHLY v NORTECH (No Adhesion) 87 CA4 599 [See: CCP 1281; CivC 1670.5; Graham v Scissor-Tail 28 C3 807; Stirlen v Supercuts 51 CA4 1519, T/AT 3/97; 24 Hour Fitness v Superior Court 66 CA4 1199, T/AT 11/98; Armendariz v Foundation Health 24 C4 83, T/AT 9/00 ]
|
|