|
2933 The state owes adjacent landowners no duty to prevent erosion of an ocean bluff by a combination of pedestrian traffic, rain, tide, wave action and wind, and is neither liable in damages nor subject to injunction for failing to do so.CitationSCHOOLER v STATE (Bluff Erosion) 85 CA4 1004 [See: GovC 831.25, 814; Morin v County 215 CA3 184; Tessier v City 219 CA3 310; Knight v City 4 CA4 918; Cairns v County 62 CA4 330; Sutton v Golden Gate 68 CA4 1149, T/AT 2/99; Mikkelsen v State 59 CA3 621; Sachs v City 151 CA3 315]
|
|
