Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
3069 REVIEW GRANTED Two attorneys representing the same client simulataneously owe each other a duty of reasonable care to the extent that the interests attorney and client do not conflict.CitationMUSSER v PROVENCHER (Lawyer Indemnity) 90 CA4 545 [See: Shaffery v Wilson 82 CA4 768, T/AT 9/00; Saunders v Weissburg 74 CA4 869, T/AT 9/99; Kroll v Paris 72 CA4 1537, T/AT 8/99; Pollack v Lytle 120 CA3 931; Crouse v Brobeck 67 CA4 1509, T/AT 1/99; Am Equity v Beck 90 CA4 162, T/AT 8/01] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||