1774 REVIEW DENIED A trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to award costs or attorney fees under FEHA to a plaintiff who received in a Superior Court action a judgment within the jurisdictional limits of the Municipal Court, so the court was correct in awarding costs to defendant, which had made a statutory offer of compromise that was higher than the judgment received by plaintiff.CitationSTEELE v JENSEN (No Costs) 59 CA4 326 [See: GovC 12965; CCP 1033, 998; Dorman v DWLC 35 CA4 1808]
|
|