Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1601 REVIEW DENIED A product may be defective for lack of warning, even though it did not fail and was not damaged in the accident that injured its user.CitationWRIGHT v STANG (Water Cannon) 54 CA4 1218 [See: Brown v Superior Court 44 C3 1049; Sparks v Owens 32 CA4 461, at 3/95; Anderson v Owens 53 C3 987; Huynh v Ingersoll-Rand 16 CA4 825, T/AT 8/93] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||