Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1692 Recollections of childhood sexual abuse are inadmissible if refreshed by sodium amytal interview, and if a case is based entirely on recollections so refreshed, the trial court does not abuse its discretion in granting summary judgment for defendant.CitationRAMONA v SUPERIOR COURT (Truth Serum) 57 CA4 107 [See: Frye v US 293 F 1013; People v Kelly 17 C3 24; People v Jones 52 C2 636; Schall v Lockheed 37 CA4 1485, T/AT 10/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||