- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
Case Summary |
|
1459 Liability for negligent misrepresentation can not be imposed unless the defendant knew or should have known that his/her representations were false; the presumption that a seller of realty knows or should know the location of property lines may be rebutted by proof that its belief in the location of the boundaries was reasonable.CitationQUALITY v HALLAK (Car Wash Encroachment) 50 CA4 1687 [See: Hauter v Zogarts 14 C3 104; Marvin v Adams 224 CA3 956]ASE |
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||