Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1656 REVIEW DENIED When balancing risks against benefits to decide whether a product was defective, a jury should consider warnings printed on the product package as a factor in determining the likelihood that injury would occur.CitationHANSEN v SUNNYSIDE PRODUCTS (Tile Cleaner) 55 CA4 1497 [See: Greenman v Yuba 59 C2 57; Cronin v Olson 8 C3 121; Barker v Lull 20 C3 413; Daly v GM 20 C3 725; Anderson v Owens 53 C3 987] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||