Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1483 An out of state franchisee's relationship with a California franchisor was sufficient contact with the state of California to permit the exercise of long-arm jurisdiction over it by California courts.CitationVONS v SEABEST (E Coli) 14 C4 434 [See: Vons v Seabest AT 9/95; CCP 410.10; Cornelison v Chaney 16 C3 143; Oregon v SuperCt 24 CA4 1550, T/AT 6/94; Helicopteros v Hall 466 US 408; Burger King v Rudzewicz 471 US 462; World-Wide v Woodson 444 US 286] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||