Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1605 If the manufacturer of a medical device violates a federal requirement, pre-emption does not prevent a state award of damages on a tort claim based on violation of a state requirement equal to, or substantially identical to, the federal requirement.CitationSTEELE v COLLAGEN (Collagen Pre-emption) 54 CA4 1474 [See: Cipollone v Liggett 505 US 504; Armstrong v Optical 50 CA4 580, T/AT 12/96; Medtronic v Lohr 135 LEd2 700] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||