|
1695 REVIEW DENIED Under a CGL policy containing an exclusion for claims resulting from assault and battery or for personal injury claims arising from incidents in which bodily harm to the claimant was intended or expected by the insured, the carrier had no obligation to defend an action brought by a person who alleged that he was beaten up by the insured's bartender -- who was also an insured -- even though the action stated causes of action for negligence and negligent hiring.CitationZELDA v NORTHLAND (Battling Bartender) 56 CA4 1252 [See: Horace Mann v Barbara B 4 C4 1076, T/AT 5/93; Gray v Zurich 65 C2 263; Waller v Truck 11 C4 1, T/AT 10/95]
|
|
