Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1636 REVIEW DENIED A criminal defense attorney's reading of a complainant's mental health records before their submission to the court is non-communicative and, therefore, not protected by the litigation privilege, and may result in tort liability for invasion of the constitutional right of privacy.CitationSHARTZER v ISRAELS (Mental Health Records) 55 CA4 1290 [See: CA Const I,1; CivC 47; Hill v NCAA 7 C4 1; People v Reber 177 CA3 523] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||