Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1726 NAME CHANGED FROM HIX The New Motor Vehicle Board does not have jurisdiction to consider a claim for contractual interference based on tortious business practices, made by a nonsignatory to a franchise agreement with an auto manufacturer.CitationTOVAS v AMERICAN HONDA (Motor Vehicle Board) 57 CA4 506 [See: VehC 3050; Yamaha v Superior Court 185 CA3 1232; Yamaha v Superior Court 195 CA3 652; Zaheri v Mitsubishi 17 CA4 288] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||