|
1687 A termination that occurred before the employer became aware of the employee's mental illness could not have been the result of discrimination based on the mental illness; a subsequent confirmation of the termination, even though it occurred after the employer became aware of the mental illness, did not make the initial termination wrongful.CitationBRUNDAGE v LA OFFICE OF THE ASSESSOR (Lost Weeks) 57 CA4 228 [See: 42 USC 12100 etseq; GovC 12900 etseq; Prilliman v United CA4 935, T/AT 5/97; Caldwell v Paramount 41 CA4 189, T/AT 1/96]
|
|
