|
1659 An employment manual that specified that drug testing would be conducted only if the employer had a reasonable ground for believing that an employee was under the influence of an intoxicating substance entitled an employee to a reasonable expectation of privacy if no such ground existed; conflicting evidence concerning the reasonableness of the employer's suspicion was sufficient to raise triable issues of fact.CitationKRASLAWSKY v UPPER DECK (Drug Test) 56 CA4 179 [See: CA Const I, 1; Hill v NCAA 7 C4 1; Loder v City of Glendale 14 C4 846]
|
|
