Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1771 REVIEW DENIED The "dismissal at pleasure" provisions of the National Bank Act do not pre-empt state actions for wrongful termination under FEHA.CitationMARQUES v BANK OF AMERICA *(T/AT Pleasure) 59 CA4 356 [See: 12 USC 21 etseq; Wells v Superior Court 53 C3 1082; Gade v National 505 US 88; Aalgaard v Merchants 224 CA3 674] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||