Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1740 Since poker players cannot prove that without cheating they would not have lost money, they cannot establish that a poker club's negligence in failing to prevent cheating was a proximate cause of money they lost.CitationVU v CALIFORNIA COMMERCE CLUB (Poker Room) 55 CA4 229 [See: Youst v Longo 43 C3 64] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||