Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1502 REVIEW DENIED Officers employed in an unlocked room in a jail do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy; secretly videotaping them is not an invasion of seclusion, does not constitute an unlawful search, and does not violate the statutory prohibition against recording confidential conversations.CitationSACRAMENTO v SACRAMENTO (Video Camera) 51 CA4 1468 [See: 42 USC 1983; PenC 632; Oliver v US 466 US 170; Katz v US 389 US 347] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||