Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1720 REVIEW GRANTED / REVIEW DISMISSED AND REMANDED TO 2ND DIST An action for intentional infliction of emotional distress brought by defendant's former husband and based on defendant's attempts to dispute the plaintiff's paternity of their child would violate public policy and, therefore, cannot be maintained. (Strong dissent.)CitationSTEVE H v WENDY S (Paternity) 57 CA4 379 [See: Self v Self 58 C2 683; Klein v Klein 58 C2 692; Nagy v Nagy 210 CA3 1262; Richard P v Superior Court 202 CA3 1089] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||