|
1488 If damage alleged to have resulted from construction defects was indivisible, a settlement purporting to release plaintiff's claims against non-settling defendants on specified theories but preserve plaintiff's rights to proceed against the non-settling defendants on other theories should not have been confirmed without greater specificity as to how those claims against the non-settling defendants could be pursued.CitationBOBROW/THOMAS v SUPERIOR COURT (Specified Theories) 50 CA4 1654 [See: Bay Development v Superior Court 50 C3 1012; Erreca's v Superior Court 19 CA4 1475, T/AT 1/94]
|
|
