Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1433 REVIEW DENIED The federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act does not pre-empt state products liability actions.CitationARMSTRONG v OPTICAL (Medical Device Pre-emption) 50 CA4 580 [See: 21 USC 360 etseq; Evraets v Intermedics 29 CA4 779, T/AT 11/94; Scott v Ciba 38 CA4 307, T/AT 10/95; Powers v Optical AT 10/95; Kennedy v Collagen 67 F3 1453; Medtronic v Lohr 116 SCt 2240] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||