|
1354 REVIEW DENIED For purposes of "doe" pleading, a plaintiff who knows the identity of a particular person, but lacks subjective knowledge of that person's connection with plaintiff's case or injuries, is "ignorant" of the defendant's identity, regardless of whether the plaintiff could have had such knowledge or failed to exercise diligence in obtaining it.CitationGMC v SUPERIOR COURT (Seat Belt Doe) 48 CA4 580 [See: CCP 474; Optical v Superior Court 228 CA3 776; Wallis v So Pac 61 CA3 782; Oakes v McCarthy 267 CA2 231; Parker v McKee 3 CA4 512; Garrett v Crown 259 CA2 647]
|
|
