Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1318 REVIEW DENIED CCP 473 -- which requires the court to vacate any default judgment or dismissal resulting from attorney mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect -- does not apply to a dismissal based on the statute of limitations.CitationCASTRO v SACRAMENTO (No Relief) 47 CA4 927 [See: Hanooka v Pivko 22 CA4 1553, T/AT 4/95; Williams v LA USD 23 CA4 84, T/AT 4/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||