- Home
 - Bios
 - Try Us Free
 - Subscribe
 - Case Library
 - CA Evidence
Discovery
Civ-Pro - Torts
 - SLAPPS
 - Text Summaries
 - Search
 - Support
 
 
						Case Summary |  					
				|
 
						1254 REVIEW DENIED If 653 separate thefts of the insured's product were the result of a conspiracy orchestrated by the Russian mafia, the thefts were a single "occurrence" and were subject to only one deductible under a policy insuring against such losses.CitationEOTT v STOREBRAND INS (Orchestrated Thefts) 45 CA4 565 [See: Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92; Peco v Boden 64 F3 852] |  
					|
| 
							 | 
							|||||
| 
							 | 
							|||||
							Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
							 | 
							|||||
							Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
							 | 
							|||||