Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1254 REVIEW DENIED If 653 separate thefts of the insured's product were the result of a conspiracy orchestrated by the Russian mafia, the thefts were a single "occurrence" and were subject to only one deductible under a policy insuring against such losses.CitationEOTT v STOREBRAND INS (Orchestrated Thefts) 45 CA4 565 [See: Bank of the West v Superior Court 2 C4 1254, T/AT 9/92; Peco v Boden 64 F3 852] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||