Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1368 In preparing audits, auditors do not owe a duty of reasonable care to anyone but their clients and express third party beneficiaries, and if a written agreement exists between auditor and client, parol evidence is inadmissible to modify it to add an express beneficiary.CitationSOFTWARE DESIGN v PRICE WATERHOUSE (Crooked Consultant) 49 CA4 464 [See: Bily v Arthur Young 3 C4 370, T/AT 11/92] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||