1109 REVIEW DENIED Actions against an investment dealer for fraudulently creating the impression that it was an agency of a bank and against the bank for fraudulently permitting the investment dealer to create that impression are not pre-empted by the federal Home Owner's Loan Act (HOLA).CitationFENNING v GLENFED (Non Bank) 40 CA4 1285 [See: 12 USC 1461 etseq; USConst VI,2; Fidelity Federal v de la Cuesta 458 US 141; THM v Commissioner 176 MichApp 772; Spitz v Goldome 210 IllApp3 215; Siegel v American Savings 210 CA3 953]
|
|