- Home
- Bios
- Try Us Free
- Subscribe
- Case Library
- CA Evidence
 Discovery
 Civ-Pro
- Torts
- SLAPPS
- Text Summaries
- Search
- Support
| Case Summary | |
| 1087 REVIEW GRANTED A restaurant owes a customer taken hostage by a robber a duty to avoid unreasonably increasing the risk of injury, and there is a triable issue of fact as to whether failing to accede to the robber's demand was a breach of that duty.CitationKENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN v SUPERIOR COURT (Robber's Demand) 40 CA4 798 [See: Rowland v Christian 69 C2 108; Ann M v Pacific Plaza 6 C4 666, T/AT 2/94; Vandermost v Alpha Beta 164 CA3 771] | |
|  | |||||
|  | |||||
| Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes) | |||||
| Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022 | |||||