|
1414 A courtroom local rule requiring that opposed motions for summary judgment be stricken from the calendar until attorneys for both sides met and conferred and submitted a statement of agreed and contested facts was invalid because it was inconsistent with CCP sections concerning motions for summary judgment, was not made in accordance with CCP 575.1, which requires, among other things, publication of such rules, and violated GovC 68070, which provides that a courtroom local rule can not take effect until the January 1 or July 1 following the 30th day after it has been filed and made available for public examination.CitationKALIVAS v BARRY CONTROLS (Courtroom Rule) 49 CA4 1152 [See: CCP 575.1; GovC 68070; 20th Century v Superior Court 28 CA4 666, T/AT 10/94; Mentzer v Hardoin 28 CA4 1365]
|
|
