Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1146 A stipulated judgment that results from negotiation and is part of a settlement is not a termination on the merits sufficient to support a subsequent action for malicious prosecution.CitationDALANY v AMERICAN PACIFIC (Malicious Cross Claim) 42 CA4 822 [See: Sheldon Appel v Albert 47 C3 863; Pender v Radin 23 CA4 1807, T/AT 5/94; Fuentes v Berry 38 CA4 1800, T/AT 12/95] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||