Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1416 REVIEW DENIED Use of a fictitious business name does not create a separate entity; once a defendant has obtained a dismissal of an action against it, the court cannot enter a default against the defendant's fictitious name in the same action.CitationPINKERTON'S v SUPERIOR COURT (Fictitious Name) 49 CA4 1432 [See: B&PC 17900 etseq; Providence v Valley Forge 42 CA4 1194, T/AT 3/956] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||