Discovery
Civ-Pro
Case Summary |
|
1136 The firefighter's rule does not justify the conclusion that operators of a building in which there was a dangerous condition did not owe a duty to a guard employed by a private security company to patrol the building.CitationMARQUEZ v MAINFRAME (Wet Floor) 42 CA4 881 [See: Donohue v SFHA 16 CA4 658, T/AT 8/93; Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Neighbarger v Irwin 8 C4 532, T/AT 11/94] |
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
Finz Case Law Summaries (Finz Advance Tapes)
|
|||||
Copyright by Pincus Legal Education, Inc. ©1992 - 2022
|
|||||