|
1196 A judo instructor owes a student a duty to avoid reckless conduct, but does not have a duty to avoid taking the student beyond his/her capabilities; making the student reach beyond his/her capabilities is an inherent risk of the activity, resulting in a primary assumption of the risk.CitationBUSHNELL v JAPANESE-AMERICAN (Judo Instructor) 43 CA4 525 [See: Knight v Jewett 3 C4 296, T/AT 10/92; Ford v Gouin 3 C4 339, T/AT 10/92; Tan v Goddard 13 CA4 1528, T/AT 5/93; Galardi v Seahorse 16 CA4 817, T/AT 8/93; Wattenbarger v Cincinnati Reds 28 CA4 946, T/AT 11/94; Fidopiastis v Hirtler AT 6/95; Regents v Superior Court 41 CA4 1040, T/AT 2/96]
|
|
