|
1278 If, as part of a fraud cause of action for the invasion of a single primary right, plaintiff alleges that defendant made several fraudulent statements, a jury may find for plaintiff if the necessary three fourths majority agrees that one of the alleged statements was fraudulently made, even though the jurors disagree about which of the alleged statements it was.CitationSTONER v WILLIAMS (Fraudulent Adoption) 46 CA4 986 [See: Handel v USF&G 192 CA3 684; People v Gordon 165 CA3 839; People v Davis 8 CA4 28; Bay Cities v Lawyers' Mutual 5 C4 854, T/AT 10/93]
|
|
