|
P0912 Although an attorney is not required to show ambiguity when requesting judicial notice, resort to legislative history is appropriate only if statutory language is ambiguous, and any such request must identify each separate document for which judicial notice is sought and be accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities showing why it is part of a cognizable legislative history.CitationKAUFMAN & BROAD v PERFORMANCE PLASTERING (Legislative History) 133 CA4 26 [See: R of C 22(a); Quintano v Mercury 11 C4 1049, T/AT 1/96; Curle v Superior Court 24 C4 1057, P/AT 3/01]
|
|
