|
P0747 Statements made by an official of a public entity about matters discussed in closed session violated the Brown Act and were therefore not a valid exercise of Constitutional right; a statement about why the attorney for a public entity was fired concerned a matter that was a fait accompli and therefore no longer of public interest; for these reasons the SLAPP statute did not apply to an action arising from the statements.CitationHARRON v BONILLA (Termination Comments) 125 CA4 738 [See: CCP 425.16; GovC 54957.1; Paul v Hanyecz 85 CA4 1356, T/AT 2/01, Du Charme v International 110 CA4 107, P/AT 9/03]
|
|
